lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ee52f17-0357-a99a-352e-424bfcc07f27@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:01:29 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     davidcomponentone@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     shuah@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix application of sizeof to pointer

On 12.10.21 05:01, davidcomponentone@...il.com wrote:
> From: David Yang <davidcomponentone@...il.com>
> 
> The coccinelle check report:
> "./tools/testing/selftests/vm/split_huge_page_test.c:344:36-42:
> ERROR: application of sizeof to pointer"
> Using the "strlen" to fix it.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: David Yang <davidcomponentone@...il.com>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/vm/split_huge_page_test.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/split_huge_page_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/split_huge_page_test.c
> index 1af16d2c2a0a..52497b7b9f1d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/split_huge_page_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/split_huge_page_test.c
> @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ void split_file_backed_thp(void)
>   	}
>   
>   	/* write something to the file, so a file-backed THP can be allocated */
> -	num_written = write(fd, tmpfs_loc, sizeof(tmpfs_loc));
> +	num_written = write(fd, tmpfs_loc, strlen(tmpfs_loc) + 1);
>   	close(fd);
>   
>   	if (num_written < 1) {
> 

I think the code really just wants to write anything to the file that 
will be >= 1, which is also the case with this weird usage of sizeof.

As an alternative, I think we can just write anything else to the file

num_written = write(fd, (void *)&fd, sizeof(fd));

or

num_written = write(fd, "1", 1);

If I am not wrong/

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ