| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <654cae73-fe44-022a-ec81-e04979be6f76@baylibre.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 10:47:49 +0200
From: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
Cc: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, khilman@...libre.com,
Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] drm/omap: introduce omap_hw_overlay
On 12/10/2021 09:59, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 23/09/2021 10:06, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> From: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
>>
>> Split out the hardware overlay specifics from omap_plane.
>> To start, the hw overlays are statically assigned to planes.
>>
>> The goal is to eventually assign hw overlays dynamically to planes
>> during plane->atomic_check() based on requested caps (scaling, YUV,
>> etc). And then perform hw overlay re-assignment if required.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c | 9 ++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.h | 4 ++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_overlay.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_overlay.h | 31 +++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c | 42 ++++++-------
>> 6 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_overlay.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_overlay.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Makefile
>> index 21e8277ff88f..710b4e0abcf0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Makefile
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ omapdrm-y := omap_drv.o \
>> omap_debugfs.o \
>> omap_crtc.o \
>> omap_plane.o \
>> + omap_overlay.o \
>> omap_encoder.o \
>> omap_fb.o \
>> omap_gem.o \
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c
>> index f86e20578143..b994014b22e8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c
>> @@ -583,10 +583,14 @@ static int omapdrm_init(struct omap_drm_private *priv, struct device *dev)
>> omap_gem_init(ddev);
>> + ret = omap_hwoverlays_init(priv);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_gem_deinit;
>> +
>> ret = omap_modeset_init(ddev);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(priv->dev, "omap_modeset_init failed: ret=%d\n", ret);
>> - goto err_gem_deinit;
>> + goto err_free_overlays;
>> }
>> /* Initialize vblank handling, start with all CRTCs disabled. */
>> @@ -618,6 +622,8 @@ static int omapdrm_init(struct omap_drm_private *priv, struct device *dev)
>> omap_fbdev_fini(ddev);
>> err_cleanup_modeset:
>> omap_modeset_fini(ddev);
>> +err_free_overlays:
>> + omap_hwoverlays_destroy(priv);
>> err_gem_deinit:
>> omap_gem_deinit(ddev);
>> destroy_workqueue(priv->wq);
>> @@ -642,6 +648,7 @@ static void omapdrm_cleanup(struct omap_drm_private *priv)
>> drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(ddev);
>> omap_modeset_fini(ddev);
>> + omap_hwoverlays_destroy(priv);
>> omap_gem_deinit(ddev);
>> destroy_workqueue(priv->wq);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.h
>> index 591d4c273f02..b4d9c2062723 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.h
>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>> #include "omap_gem.h"
>> #include "omap_irq.h"
>> #include "omap_plane.h"
>> +#include "omap_overlay.h"
>> #define DBG(fmt, ...) DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(fmt"\n", ##__VA_ARGS__)
>> #define VERB(fmt, ...) if (0) DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) /* verbose debug */
>> @@ -57,6 +58,9 @@ struct omap_drm_private {
>> unsigned int num_planes;
>> struct drm_plane *planes[8];
>> + unsigned int num_ovls;
>> + struct omap_hw_overlay *overlays[8];
>> +
>> struct drm_fb_helper *fbdev;
>> struct workqueue_struct *wq;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_overlay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_overlay.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..2b1416d2aad2
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_overlay.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
>> + * Author: Benoit Parrot, <bparrot@...com>
>
> Extra comma there, and similar case below.
Fixed
>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <drm/drm_atomic.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_plane_helper.h>
>> +
>> +#include "omap_dmm_tiler.h"
>> +#include "omap_drv.h"
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * overlay funcs
>> + */
>> +static const char * const overlay_id_to_name[] = {
>> + [OMAP_DSS_GFX] = "gfx",
>> + [OMAP_DSS_VIDEO1] = "vid1",
>> + [OMAP_DSS_VIDEO2] = "vid2",
>> + [OMAP_DSS_VIDEO3] = "vid3",
>> +};
>
> I was expecting to see the name array to be removed from omap_plane.c as it's moved here, but that's not the case. Why is that? Especially as after this series these names make no sense with the planes.
You're right, I'll remove the one from omap_plane.c and where it's used.
>
>> +static void omap_overlay_destroy(struct omap_hw_overlay *overlay)
>> +{
>> + kfree(overlay);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct omap_hw_overlay *omap_overlay_init(enum omap_plane_id overlay_id,
>> + enum omap_overlay_caps caps)
>> +{
>> + struct omap_hw_overlay *overlay;
>> +
>> + overlay = kzalloc(sizeof(*overlay), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!overlay)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> + overlay->name = overlay_id_to_name[overlay_id];
>> + overlay->overlay_id = overlay_id;
>> + overlay->caps = caps;
>> + /*
>> + * When this is called priv->num_crtcs is not known yet.
>> + * Use a safe mask value to start with, it will get updated to the
>> + * proper value after the first use.
>> + */
>> + overlay->possible_crtcs = 0xff;
>
> This sounds like a hack. Why do we need possible_crtcs anyway? If I'm not mistaken, on all DSS versions any overlay can be used on any ctrtc. On the DRM plane level we need the possible_crtc as the DRM framework needs that (i.e. we just always set all crtcs available for all planes), but why is it needed here?
Indeed, in omap_drv.c we have:
plane_crtc_mask = (1 << priv->num_pipes) - 1;
for all planes, so I'll rework this.
>
>> + return overlay;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int omap_hwoverlays_init(struct omap_drm_private *priv)
>> +{
>> + static const enum omap_plane_id hw_plane_ids[] = {
>> + OMAP_DSS_GFX, OMAP_DSS_VIDEO1,
>> + OMAP_DSS_VIDEO2, OMAP_DSS_VIDEO3,
>> + };
>> + u32 num_overlays = dispc_get_num_ovls(priv->dispc);
>> + enum omap_overlay_caps caps;
>> + int i, ret;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_overlays; i++) {
>> + struct omap_hw_overlay *overlay;
>> +
>> + caps = dispc_ovl_get_caps(priv->dispc, hw_plane_ids[i]);
>> + overlay = omap_overlay_init(hw_plane_ids[i], caps);
>> + if (IS_ERR(overlay)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(overlay);
>> + dev_err(priv->dev, "failed to construct overlay for %s (%d)\n",
>> + overlay_id_to_name[i], ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>
> I think this leaks memory if omap_overlay_init() fails.
Fixed
>
>> + overlay->idx = priv->num_ovls;
>> + priv->overlays[priv->num_ovls++] = overlay;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void omap_hwoverlays_destroy(struct omap_drm_private *priv)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_ovls; i++) {
>> + omap_overlay_destroy(priv->overlays[i]);
>> + priv->overlays[i] = NULL;
>> + }
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_overlay.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_overlay.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..892fecb67adb
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_overlay.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
>> + * Author: Benoit Parrot, <bparrot@...com>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef __OMAPDRM_OVERLAY_H__
>> +#define __OMAPDRM_OVERLAY_H__
>> +
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>> +enum drm_plane_type;
>> +
>> +struct drm_device;
>> +struct drm_mode_object;
>> +struct drm_plane;
>> +
>> +/* Used to associate a HW overlay/plane to a plane */
>> +struct omap_hw_overlay {
>> + int idx;
>
> unsigned int.
>
>> +
>> + const char *name;
>> + enum omap_plane_id overlay_id;
>
> Perhaps just "id" is fine. You don't have "overlay_name" there either, but just "name".
Ack
>
> Tomi
Thanks,
Neil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists