[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zgrek1gl.mognet@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 10:59:54 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: Woody Lin <woodylin@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Woody Lin <woodylin@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/scs: Reset the shadow stack when idle_task_exit
On 12/10/21 16:35, Woody Lin wrote:
> There was a 'init_idle' that resets scs sp to base, but is removed by
> f1a0a376ca0c. Without the resetting, the hot-plugging implemented by
> cpu_psci_cpu_boot will use the previous scs sp as new base when starting
> up a CPU core, so the usage on scs page is being stacked up until
> overflow.
>
> This only happens on idle task since __cpu_up is using idle task as the
> main thread to start up a CPU core, so the overflow can be fixed by
> resetting scs sp to base in 'idle_task_exit'.
>
Looking at init_idle() for similar issues, it looks like we might also want
to re-issue kasan_unpoison_task_stack() on the idle task upon hotplug.
> Fixes: f1a0a376ca0c ("sched/core: Initialize the idle task with preemption disabled")
> Signed-off-by: Woody Lin <woodylin@...gle.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 1bba4128a3e6..f21714ea3db8 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -8795,6 +8795,7 @@ void idle_task_exit(void)
> finish_arch_post_lock_switch();
> }
>
> + scs_task_reset(current);
> /* finish_cpu(), as ran on the BP, will clean up the active_mm state */
So AIUI for SCS that works just fine - one thing I'm unclear on is how the
following pops are going to work given the SP reset happens in the middle
of a call stack, but AFAICT that was already the case before I messed about
with init_idle(), so that must already be handled.
I'm not familiar enough with KASAN to say whether that
kasan_unpoison_task_stack() should rather happen upon hotplugging the CPU
back (rather than on hot-unplug). If that is the case, then maybe somewhere
around cpu_startup_entry() might work (and then you could bunch these two
"needs to be re-run at init for the idle task" functions into a common
helper).
> }
>
> --
> 2.33.0.882.g93a45727a2-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists