lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWVmvHsEkPFkrD/R@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:43:08 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@...inois.edu>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        "moderated list:ARM PORT" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] ep93xx: clock: convert in-place to COMMON_CLK

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 12:36:54PM +0200, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 11:26 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:05:08AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> > You're going to have to tell me what's going on here:

> >    https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210914103212.GB4434@sirena.org.uk/

> here you were asking about "spi: spi-ep93xx: Prepare clock before using it"
> which you've already applied (as 7c72dc56a631).

Right, you asked me to do the same thing on two patches so I didn't send
the same thing over and over again.

> Nevertheless, there are no dependencies in the patches 1..7, they are all
> pre-requsites for the last patch 8/8.

So what's going on with patch 8 then?  Is there some plan to merge it?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ