[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWVvfBybqjKuifum@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:20:28 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: 王贇 <yun.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ftrace: prevent preemption in
perf_ftrace_function_call()
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 01:40:31PM +0800, 王贇 wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
> index 6aed10e..33c2f76 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
> @@ -441,12 +441,19 @@ void perf_trace_buf_update(void *record, u16 type)
> if (!rcu_is_watching())
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * Prevent CPU changing from now on. rcu must
> + * be in watching if the task was migrated and
> + * scheduled.
> + */
> + preempt_disable_notrace();
> +
> if ((unsigned long)ops->private != smp_processor_id())
> - return;
> + goto out;
>
> bit = ftrace_test_recursion_trylock(ip, parent_ip);
> if (bit < 0)
> - return;
> + goto out;
>
> event = container_of(ops, struct perf_event, ftrace_ops);
>
This seems rather daft, wouldn't it be easier to just put that check
under the recursion thing?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists