linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] ep93xx: clock: convert in-place to COMMON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3ea0db23ab3284fdee2fec6cfc08026a0acccb6f.camel@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Oct 2021 14:57:45 +0200
From:   Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@...inois.edu>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        "moderated list:ARM PORT" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] ep93xx: clock: convert in-place to COMMON_CLK

Hi Arnd,

On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 14:39 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Right, if everything else is in mainline, then having the last two patches
> in the soc tree gets the job done the quickest.
> 
> If any of the other patches are only in linux-next but not in mainline yet,
> then it seems best for Mark to take the ASoC/i2s patch for v5.16, and I'll
> take the last one for v5.17, or maybe queue it separately from the rest
> and send that in the second half of the 5.16 merge window after everything
> else has landed.

correct, everything else is in mainline, only these two left floating.
Should I resend them for soc patchwork?

-- 
Alexander Sverdlin.