[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6c2337ed83c237f70716cb4c62794d1d3da31f2.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 18:21:57 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tpm: use SM3 instead of SM3_256
On Sat, 2021-10-09 at 21:08 +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> According to https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-01.html,
> SM3 always produces a 256-bit hash value and there are no plans for
> other length development, so there is no ambiguity in the name of sm3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
This is not enough to make any changes because the commit message
does not describe what goes wrong if we keep it as it was.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists