linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] s390: DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211012113404.29ac7c9c@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:34:04 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] s390: DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALL support

On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:59:02 +0200
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

> One thing to note: Jiri adds a new a sample module, which obviously
> will not compile for s390. Not sure if the config mechanism I propose
> with this patch set is the best way to address this - it would then
> require to add a config option for each new sample module.

Is that really an issue?

We could just group them, as long as they have the same prefix.

HAVE_SAMPLE_FTRACE_DIRECT
HAVE_SAMPLE_FTRACE_MULTI_DIRECT

??

-- Steve