linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] s390: DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YWXDcoQEVm1uCCEP@osiris>
Date:   Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:18:42 +0200
From:   Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] s390: DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALL support

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:34:04AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:59:02 +0200
> Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > One thing to note: Jiri adds a new a sample module, which obviously
> > will not compile for s390. Not sure if the config mechanism I propose
> > with this patch set is the best way to address this - it would then
> > require to add a config option for each new sample module.
> 
> Is that really an issue?
> 
> We could just group them, as long as they have the same prefix.
> 
> HAVE_SAMPLE_FTRACE_DIRECT
> HAVE_SAMPLE_FTRACE_MULTI_DIRECT

Sure, works for me. I just thought I should mention this.