linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 8/9] spmi: pmic-arb: make interrupt support optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <163406051353.936959.12718174954614897750@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Oct 2021 10:41:53 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     collinsd@...eaurora.org, subbaram@...eaurora.org,
        quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 8/9] spmi: pmic-arb: make interrupt support optional

Quoting Fenglin Wu (2021-09-16 23:33:03)
> From: David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>
> 
> Make the support of PMIC peripheral interrupts optional for
> spmi-pmic-arb devices.  This is useful in situations where
> SPMI address mapping is required without the need for IRQ
> support.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------

Is there a binding update? Can the binding be converted to YAML as well?

>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
> index 988204c..55fa981 100644
> --- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
> +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
> @@ -1280,10 +1280,12 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                 goto err_put_ctrl;
>         }
>  
> -       pmic_arb->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "periph_irq");
> -       if (pmic_arb->irq < 0) {
> -               err = pmic_arb->irq;
> -               goto err_put_ctrl;
> +       if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupt-names", NULL)) {

I don't think we should be keying off of interrupt-names. Instead we
should be checking for something else. Maybe interrupt-controller
property?

> +               pmic_arb->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "periph_irq");
> +               if (pmic_arb->irq < 0) {
> +                       err = pmic_arb->irq;
> +                       goto err_put_ctrl;