linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: exynos: fix cpu unit name warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+Eumj5Fx6tQv9B9R9iBCP4C=f2dk3szCGcisvPHYfMWpsCCfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:01:04 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>, soc@...nel.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: exynos: fix cpu unit name warnings

On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 at 16:38, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> dtc started warning about some of the CPU addresses:
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9.dtsi:78.20-83.5: Warning (unit_address_format): /cpus/cpu@...000: unit name should not have leading 0s
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9.dtsi:85.20-90.5: Warning (unit_address_format): /cpus/cpu@...100: unit name should not have leading 0s
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9.dtsi:92.20-97.5: Warning (unit_address_format): /cpus/cpu@...200: unit name should not have leading 0s
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9.dtsi:99.20-104.5: Warning (unit_address_format): /cpus/cpu@...300: unit name should not have leading 0s
>
> Remove the leading zeroes.
>
> Fixes: f695b3f4c45d ("arm64: dts: exynos: add initial support for exynosautov9 SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---

Thanks Arnd, but this was fixed with the next version of patchset.
It's my bad because I did not drop the patch from my next branch after
spotting it, knowing that Chanho will resubmit the next day and then I
would replace it. This replacement happened next day but linux next
got the older/buggy patch.


Best regards,
Krzysztof