[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYwTUopZ_6khRpkAPFg6qiRTOgyKe=URzVRrNagK2HZMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:12:39 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Alvin Šipraga <alvin@...s.dk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
Michael Rasmussen <mir@...g-olufsen.dk>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/6] net: dsa: realtek-smi: add rtl8365mb
subdriver for RTL8365MB-VC
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 2:37 PM Alvin Šipraga <alvin@...s.dk> wrote:
> This patch adds a realtek-smi subdriver for the RTL8365MB-VC 4+1 port
> 10/100/1000M switch controller. The driver has been developed based on a
> GPL-licensed OS-agnostic Realtek vendor driver known as rtl8367c found
> in the OpenWrt source tree.
(...)
> Co-developed-by: Michael Rasmussen <mir@...g-olufsen.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Rasmussen <mir@...g-olufsen.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>
Overall this driver looks very good :)
Some minor nits below:
> +static irqreturn_t rtl8365mb_irq(int irq, void *data)
> +{
(...)
> + if (!line_changes)
> + goto out_none;
> +
> + while (line_changes) {
> + int line = __ffs(line_changes);
> + int child_irq;
> +
> + line_changes &= ~BIT(line);
> +
> + child_irq = irq_find_mapping(smi->irqdomain, line);
> + handle_nested_irq(child_irq);
> + }
What about just:
for_each_set_bit(offset, &line_changes, 32) {
child_irq = irq_find_mapping(smi->irqdomain, line);
handle_nested_irq(child_irq);
}
?
I don't know how many or which bits are valid IRQs, 16 maybe rather
than 32.
> +static struct irq_chip rtl8365mb_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "rtl8365mb",
> + /* The hardware doesn't support masking IRQs on a per-port basis */
> +};
I would rathe make this a dynamically allocated struct inside
struct rtl8365mb, so the irqchip lives with the instance of the
chip. (Which is nice if there would happen to be two of these
chips in a system.)
> +static int _rtl8365mb_irq_enable(struct realtek_smi *smi, bool enable)
I'm personally a bit allergic to _rand_underscore_naming, as sometimes
that means "inner function" and sometimes it means "compiler intrinsic"
I would just name it rtl8365mb_irq_config_commit()
(no strong opinion)
> + /* Configure chip interrupt signal polarity */
> + irq_trig = irqd_get_trigger_type(irq_get_irq_data(irq));
Nice that you preserve this edge trigger config from the machine
description (DT)!
With this fixed or not (your preference)
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists