linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 16/22] perf test: bp tests use test case

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211013174604.747276-17-irogers@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:45:58 -0700
From:   Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        "Paul A . Clarke" <pc@...ibm.com>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     eranian@...gle.com, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 16/22] perf test: bp tests use test case

Migration toward kunit style test cases.

Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/bp_account.c         | 7 ++++++-
 tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c          | 7 ++++++-
 tools/perf/tests/bp_signal_overflow.c | 7 ++++++-
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bp_account.c b/tools/perf/tests/bp_account.c
index 365120146d17..e4f7b635ffef 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bp_account.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bp_account.c
@@ -205,8 +205,13 @@ static bool test__bp_account_is_supported(void)
 #endif
 }
 
+static struct test_case bp_accounting_tests[] = {
+	TEST_CASE("Breakpoint accounting", bp_accounting),
+	{ .name = NULL, }
+};
+
 struct test_suite suite__bp_accounting = {
 	.desc = "Breakpoint accounting",
-	.func = test__bp_accounting,
+	.test_cases = bp_accounting_tests,
 	.is_supported = test__bp_account_is_supported,
 };
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
index 3c269f81818a..1676e3a11906 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
@@ -312,8 +312,13 @@ bool test__bp_signal_is_supported(void)
 #endif
 }
 
+static struct test_case bp_signal_tests[] = {
+	TEST_CASE("Breakpoint overflow signal handler", bp_signal),
+	{ .name = NULL, }
+};
+
 struct test_suite suite__bp_signal = {
 	.desc = "Breakpoint overflow signal handler",
-	.func = test__bp_signal,
+	.test_cases = bp_signal_tests,
 	.is_supported = test__bp_signal_is_supported,
 };
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal_overflow.c b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal_overflow.c
index 5ac6e1393cf4..bc1f13851750 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal_overflow.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal_overflow.c
@@ -134,8 +134,13 @@ static int test__bp_signal_overflow(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int
 	return fails ? TEST_FAIL : TEST_OK;
 }
 
+static struct test_case bp_signal_overflow_tests[] = {
+	TEST_CASE("Breakpoint overflow sampling", bp_signal_overflow),
+	{ .name = NULL, }
+};
+
 struct test_suite suite__bp_signal_overflow = {
 	.desc = "Breakpoint overflow sampling",
-	.func = test__bp_signal_overflow,
+	.test_cases = bp_signal_overflow_tests,
 	.is_supported = test__bp_signal_is_supported,
 };
-- 
2.33.0.882.g93a45727a2-goog