[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211013175405.GB24542@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:54:05 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Sebastien Laveze <sebastien.laveze@....nxp.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yangbo.lu@....com, yannick.vignon@....nxp.com,
rui.sousa@....nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ptp: add vclock timestamp conversion IOCTL
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 03:28:12PM +0200, Sebastien Laveze wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 06:10 -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > That means no control over the phase of the output signals. Super.
>
> You have. There's just a small conversion to go from and to the low-
> level hardware counter. (Which also needs to be done for rx/tx
> timestamps btw)
> When programming an output signal you use this offset to have the right
> phase.
I have an i210 with 2 periodic output channels. How am I supposed to
generate signals from two different virtual PTP clocks?
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists