[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <TYAPR01MB6330E91C3C58827D4F1F4EFE8BB79@TYAPR01MB6330.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 02:09:19 +0000
From: "tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com" <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>
To: 'James Morse' <james.morse@....com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@...iainc.com>,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
"lcherian@...vell.com" <lcherian@...vell.com>,
"bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com" <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 00/23] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read()
return values in bytes
Hi James,
> Hello!
>
> Patches 1&2 have been posted independently in case they are wanted as fixes.
>
> The major change in this version is when the mba_mbps[] array is allocated.
>
> ---
> The aim of this series is to insert a split between the parts of the monitor code
> that the architecture must implement, and those that are part of the resctrl
> filesystem. The eventual aim is to move all filesystem parts out to live in
> /fs/resctrl, so that resctrl can be wired up for MPAM.
>
> What's MPAM? See the cover letter of a previous series. [1]
>
> The series adds domain online/offline callbacks to allow the filesystem to
> manage some of its structures itself, then moves all the 'mba_sc' behaviour to
> be part of the filesystem.
> This means another architecture doesn't need to provide an mbps_val array.
> As its all software, the resctrl filesystem should be able to do this without any
> help from the architecture code.
>
> Finally __rmid_read() is refactored to be the API call that the architecture
> provides to read a counter value. All the hardware specific overflow detection,
> scaling and value correction should occur behind this helper.
>
>
> This series is based on v5.15-rc3, and can be retrieved from:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git
> mpam/resctrl_monitors_in_bytes/v2
>
> [0] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git
> mpam/resctrl_merge_cdp/v7 [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210728170637.25610-1-james.morse@arm.com
> /
>
> [v1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com
> /
I have tested these patches on Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6254 CPU with resctrl selftest.
It is no problem.
Shaopeng Tan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists