linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] ASoC: rt9120: Add Richtek RT9120 supprot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <163415517074.1358186.14156300933559857070.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 Oct 2021 20:59:51 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     tiwai@...e.com, cy_huang <u0084500@...il.com>,
        oder_chiou@...ltek.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, perex@...ex.cz
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        lgirdwood@...il.com, allen_lin@...htek.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, cy_huang@...htek.com,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] ASoC: rt9120: Add Richtek RT9120 supprot

On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 09:28:37 +0800, cy_huang wrote:
> From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>
> 
> This patch series Add the Richtek RT9120 support.
> 
> In v4:
> - Add 'classd_tlv' for 'SPK Gain Volume' control item.
> - Unify the tlv declaration to the postfix '_tlv'.
> - Fix 'digital_tlv' mute as 1 to declare the minimum is muted.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: rt9120: Add initial bindings
      commit: 126a76ada98f17c7f4ed1cc8b8e0429c574924e5
[2/2] ASoC: rt9120: Add rt9210 audio amplifier support
      commit: 7228d83531fcd801aeac97db99a028a386a2e828

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark