[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <163416267274.936110.2784588823311275089@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:04:32 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: mfd: sprd: Add bindings for ums512 global registers
Quoting Chunyan Zhang (2021-09-22 23:41:35)
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/sprd,ums512-glbreg.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/sprd,ums512-glbreg.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3522f3d2d8de
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/sprd,ums512-glbreg.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/sprd,ums512-glbreg.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Unisoc System Global Register Device Tree Bindings
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>
> + - Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>
> + - Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
> +
> +description:
> + Unisoc system global registers provide register map
> + for clocks and some multimedia modules of the SoC.
> +
> +properties:
> + "#address-cells": true
> + "#size-cells": true
> +
> + compatible:
> + items:
> + - const: sprd,ums512-glbregs
> + - const: syscon
> + - const: simple-mfd
> +
> + ranges:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> +patternProperties:
> + "^.*@[0-9a-f]+$":
> + # Child node
> + type: object
> + $ref: "../clock/sprd,ums512-clk.yaml"
> + description:
> + Clock controller for the SoC clocks.
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + ap_apb_regs: syscon@...00000 {
> + compatible = "sprd,ums512-glbregs", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
> + reg = <0x71000000 0x3000>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges = <0 0x71000000 0x3000>;
> +
> + clock-controller@0 {
> + compatible = "sprd,ums512-apahb-gate";
Why is this a subnode of a syscon and simple-mfd? Why not put the
clock-controller@...00000 directly onto the bus? Does making it a child
node help somehow?
> + reg = <0x0 0x2000>;
> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> + };
> + };
Powered by blists - more mailing lists