[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWdcPbLLGGkbrjI5@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:22:53 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] dt-bindings: leds: register-bit-led: Use 'reg'
instead of 'offset'
On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 14:28:10 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> 'reg' is the standard property for defining register banks/addresses. Add
> it to use for the register address and deprecate 'offset'. This also
> allows for using standard node names with unit-addresses. However, since
> it is quite possible to have multiple nodes at the same register
> address, allow for the unit-address to optionally have the bit
> offset. The unit-address format is '@<reg address>[,<bit offset>]'. This
> matches the format recently added for nvmem binding which has the same
> issue.
>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Cc: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
> .../bindings/leds/register-bit-led.yaml | 25 ++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists