[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ffed063-4322-2213-0f0b-d899eae32ddd@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:31:24 -0500
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: brijesh.singh@....com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
marcorr@...gle.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 v5 39/45] KVM: SVM: Introduce ops for the post gfn
map and unmap
On 10/13/21 3:10 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>> On 10/13/21 1:10 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> Side topic, what do you think about s/assigned/private for the "public" APIs, as
>>> suggested/implied above? I actually like the terminology when talking specifically
>>> about the RMP, but it doesn't fit the abstractions that tend to be used when talking
>>> about these things in other contexts, e.g. in KVM.
>> I can float the idea to see if docs folks is okay with the changes but
>> generally speaking we all have been referring the assigned == private in
>> the Linux SNP support patch.
> Oh, I wasn't suggesting anything remotely close to an "official" change, it was
> purely a suggestion for the host-side patches. It might even be unique to this
> one helper.
Ah, sure I am good with calling a private in the helper.
-Brijesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists