[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhSdy042JY_Vm2j_d5t4jweS3gf51h30j1O9LXDnE6KkB8AEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:41:46 +0530
From: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] dt-bindings: update riscv plic compatible string
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:52 AM <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> Add the compatible string "thead,c900-plic" to the riscv plic
> bindings to support SOCs with thead,c9xx processor cores.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
> Cc: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
> Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes since V3:
> - Rename "c9xx" to "c900"
> - Add thead,c900-plic in the description section
> ---
> .../bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml
> index 08d5a57ce00f..82629832e5a5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml
> @@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ description:
> contains a specific memory layout, which is documented in chapter 8 of the
> SiFive U5 Coreplex Series Manual <https://static.dev.sifive.com/U54-MC-RVCoreIP.pdf>.
>
> + While the "thead,c900-plic" would mask IRQ with readl(claim), so it needn't
> + mask/unmask which needed in RISC-V PLIC. When in IRQS_ONESHOT & IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED
> + path, unnecessary mask operation would cause a blocking irq bug in thead,c900-plic.
> + Because when IRQ is disabled in c900, writel(hwirq, claim) would be invalid.
This is a totally incorrect description of the errata required for C9xx PLIC.
Please don't project non-compliance as a feature of C9xx PLIC.
> +
> maintainers:
> - Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@...ive.com>
> - Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
> @@ -46,6 +51,7 @@ properties:
> - enum:
> - sifive,fu540-c000-plic
> - canaan,k210-plic
> + - thead,c900-plic
> - const: sifive,plic-1.0.0
The PLIC DT node requires two compatible string:
<implementation_compat>, <spec_compat>
The C9xx PLIC is not RISC-V PLIC so, the DT node should
be: "thead,c900-plic", "thead,c9xx-plic"
You need to change "- const: sifive,plic-1.0.0" to
- enum:
- sifive,plic-1.0.0
- thead,c9xx-plic
>
> reg:
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Regards,
Anup
Powered by blists - more mailing lists