linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 01/10] powerpc: Move 'struct ppc64_opd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202110122358.4AFDC0BC7@keescook>
Date:   Tue, 12 Oct 2021 23:59:02 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/10] powerpc: Move 'struct ppc64_opd_entry' back
 into asm/elf.h

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 05:25:28PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> 'struct ppc64_opd_entry' doesn't belong to uapi/asm/elf.h
> 
> It was initially in module_64.c and commit 2d291e902791 ("Fix compile
> failure with non modular builds") moved it into asm/elf.h
> 
> But it was by mistake added outside of __KERNEL__ section,
> therefore commit c3617f72036c ("UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate
> arch/powerpc/include/asm") moved it to uapi/asm/elf.h
> 
> Move it back into asm/elf.h, this brings it back in line with
> IA64 and PARISC architectures.
> 
> Fixes: 2d291e902791 ("Fix compile failure with non modular builds")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>

I'd agree with Arnd: this is a reasonable cleanup and nothing should be
using it.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook