lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3546e6c-face-31ad-af40-0599c7d5c714@microchip.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Oct 2021 09:33:50 +0000
From:   <Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com>
To:     <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC:     <rdunlap@...radead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: atmel: add COMPILE_TEST for SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC

On 13.10.2021 11:40, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Codrin,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:15 AM <Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com> wrote:
>> On 03.10.2021 06:03, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> Geert pointed out that since sound/soc has the soc_dummy_driver for
>>> NO_DMA platforms, it is possible (desirable) to have drivers that
>>> depend on HAS_DMA to alternately depend on COMPILE_TEST.
>>>
>>> This means that SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC can depend on HAS_DMA || COMPIE_TEST.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 6c5c659dfe3f ("ASoC: atmel: ATMEL drivers don't need HAS_DMA")
>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>>> Suggested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>>> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
>>> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org
>>> Cc: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>
>>> ---
>>>    sound/soc/atmel/Kconfig |    1 +
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> --- linux-next-20211001.orig/sound/soc/atmel/Kconfig
>>> +++ linux-next-20211001/sound/soc/atmel/Kconfig
>>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ if SND_ATMEL_SOC
>>>
>>>    config SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC
>>>           bool
>>> +       depends on HAS_DMA || COMPILE_TEST
>>
>> SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC compiles fine without HAS_DMA, so I don't understand
>> the need for this...
> 
> Does it work without DMA support?
> If not, it doesn't make much sense to offer this option to the user, unless
> the user is compile-testing.

it is using a Peripheral DMA controller, that is mapped in SSC's address 
space and is not using the DMA engine. I see that HAS_DMA is needed for 
the DMA mapping API, which we use, so I guess we do depend on it. That 
being said:

Reviewed-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>

Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ