[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211013113706.GA92593@fuller.cnet>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:37:06 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nitesh Lal <nilal@...hat.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Alex Belits <abelits@...its.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v4 1/8] add basic task isolation prctl interface
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 07:56:37AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:05:34PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 04:23:47PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > Add basic prctl task isolation interface, which allows
> > > informing the kernel that application is executing
> > > latency sensitive code (where interruptions are undesired).
> > >
> > > Interface is described by task_isolation.rst (added by
> > > next patch).
> >
> > That does not absolve you from actually writing a changelog here.
> > Life is too short to try and read rst shit.
>
> The rst is concise and contains all necessary information.
>
> Changelog is on the patch header (I would appreciate reviews of
> the interface itself, not sure why the changelog is important).
Err, changelog is on the patchset intro.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists