linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] crypto: ccp - Consolidate sev INIT logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Oct 2021 06:46:39 -0500
From:   Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To:     Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
Cc:     brijesh.singh@....com,
        "Lendacky, Thomas" <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Marc Orr <marcorr@...gle.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        John Allen <john.allen@....com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: ccp - Consolidate sev INIT logic


On 10/12/21 7:34 AM, Peter Gonda wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 9:52 AM Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/5/21 12:52 PM, Peter Gonda wrote:
>>> +static int sev_init_if_required(int cmd_id, bool writable,
>>> +                             struct sev_issue_cmd *argp)
>>> +{
>>> +     struct sev_device *sev = psp_master->sev_data;
>>> +
>>> +     lockdep_assert_held(&sev_cmd_mutex);
>>> +
>>> +     if (!writable)
>>> +             return -EPERM;
>>> +
>>> +     if (cmd_id == SEV_FACTORY_RESET || cmd_id == SEV_PLATFORM_STATUS ||
>>> +         cmd_id == SEV_GET_ID || cmd_id == SEV_GET_ID2)
>>> +             return 0;
>>> +
>>> +     if (sev->state == SEV_STATE_UNINIT)
>>> +             return __sev_platform_init_locked(&argp->error);
>>> +
>>> +     return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static long sev_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
>>>  {
>>>       void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
>>> @@ -840,8 +825,11 @@ static long sev_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
>>>
>>>       mutex_lock(&sev_cmd_mutex);
>>>
>>> -     switch (input.cmd) {
>>> +     ret = sev_init_if_required(input.cmd, writable, &input);
>>> +     if (ret)
>>> +             goto copy_out;
>> We need to call this function only for the SEV commands (i.e input.cmd
>>> =0 && input.cmd <= SEV_GET_ID2). Otherwise a invalid command may
>> trigger SEV_INIT. e.g below sequence:
>>
>> 1) SEV_FACTORY_RESET   // this will transition the fw to UNINIT state.
>>
>> 2) <INVALID_CMD_ID>   // since fw was in uninit this invalid command
>> will initialize the fw and then later switch will fail.
> Good catch, I took Marc's suggested approach for a V2. Does that sound
> reasonable?

Yes, that works.

thanks