[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211013082025-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:21:26 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>, jasowang@...hat.com,
stefanha@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] virtio-blk: Add validation for block size in config
space
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 01:40:41PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 06:42:43AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Stefan also pointed out this duplicates the logic from
> >
> > if (blksize < 512 || blksize > PAGE_SIZE || !is_power_of_2(blksize))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> >
> > and a bunch of other places.
> >
> >
> > Would it be acceptable for blk layer to validate the input
> > instead of having each driver do it's own thing?
> > Maybe inside blk_queue_logical_block_size?
>
> I'm pretty sure we want down that before. Let's just add a helper
> just for that check for now as part of this series. Actually validating
> in in blk_queue_logical_block_size seems like a good idea, but returning
> errors from that has a long tail.
Xie Yongji, I think I will revert this patch for now - can you
please work out adding that helper and using it in virtio?
Thanks,
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists