linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio: write back F_VERSION

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:52:38 +0200
From:   Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc:     Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        markver@...ibm.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        stefanha@...hat.com, Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@...anix.com>,
        qemu-devel@...gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio: write back F_VERSION_1 before validate

On Wed, Oct 13 2021, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 01:23:50PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Can we get this kernel patch queued for 5.15 and stable without waiting for the QEMU patch
>> as we have a regression with 4.14?
>
> Probably. Still trying to decide between this and plain revert for 5.15
> and back. Maybe both?

Probably better queue this one, in case we have some undiscovered
problems with the config space access in virtio-net?