linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Oct 2021 13:10:25 +0000
From:   <Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com>
To:     <Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com>
CC:     <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
        <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
        <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source

> I think actually I will drop this patch series because apparently
> lan966x works fine also with the peripheral clock. So then no changes
> are required.
> 
> If you think is worth it, I can do another version with the proposed
> changes.

Probably not until we have an implemented good reason to use GCLK.

Best regards,
Codrin