[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211013134154.1085649-4-yanfei.xu@windriver.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 21:41:54 +0800
From: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@...driver.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
longman@...hat.com, boqun.feng@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 3/3] locking/rwsem: fix comments about reader optimistic lock stealing conditions
After the commit 617f3ef95177 ("locking/rwsem: Remove reader
optimistic spinning"), reader doesn't support optimistic spinning
anymore, there is no need meet the condition which OSQ is empty.
BTW, add an unlikely() for the max reader wakeup check in the loop.
Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@...driver.com>
---
kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
index 06925b43c3e7..2bd914187399 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -56,7 +56,6 @@
*
* A fast path reader optimistic lock stealing is supported when the rwsem
* is previously owned by a writer and the following conditions are met:
- * - OSQ is empty
* - rwsem is not currently writer owned
* - the handoff isn't set.
*/
@@ -485,7 +484,7 @@ static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
/*
* Limit # of readers that can be woken up per wakeup call.
*/
- if (woken >= MAX_READERS_WAKEUP)
+ if (unlikely(woken >= MAX_READERS_WAKEUP))
break;
}
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists