[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWhGQLHnA9BIVBpr@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:01:20 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] compiler_types: mark __compiletime_assert failure as
__noreturn
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 03:23:31PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> `__compiletime_assert` declares a fake `extern` function
> which appears (to the compiler) to be called when the test fails.
>
> Therefore, compilers may emit possibly-uninitialized warnings
> in some cases, even if it will be an error anyway (for compilers
> supporting the `error` attribute, e.g. GCC and Clang >= 14)
> or a link failure (for those that do not, e.g. Clang < 14).
>
> Annotating the fake function as `__noreturn` gives them
> the information they need to avoid the warning,
> e.g. see https://godbolt.org/z/x1v69jjYY.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/llvm/202110100514.3h9CI4s0-lkp@intel.com/
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/compiler_types.h | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_types.h b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> index b6ff83a714ca..ca1a66b8cd2f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> @@ -298,7 +298,13 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data {
> #ifdef __OPTIMIZE__
> # define __compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix) \
> do { \
> - extern void prefix ## suffix(void) __compiletime_error(msg); \
> + /* \
> + * __noreturn is needed to give the compiler enough \
> + * information to avoid certain possibly-uninitialized \
> + * warnings (regardless of the build failing). \
> + */ \
> + __noreturn extern void prefix ## suffix(void) \
> + __compiletime_error(msg); \
> if (!(condition)) \
> prefix ## suffix(); \
> } while (0)
Should we not convert this to _Static_assert, now that all supported
compilers are of recent enough vintage to support that?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists