linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 10/11] dt-bindings: i2c: imx-lpi2c: Add i.MX8DXL compatible match

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YWiM/vn8RPR1J9+r@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 14 Oct 2021 15:03:10 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
Cc:     Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/11] dt-bindings: i2c: imx-lpi2c: Add i.MX8DXL
 compatible match

On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 04:26:03PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> Add i.MX8DXL lpi2c compatible to the bindings documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx-lpi2c.yaml | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx-lpi2c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx-lpi2c.yaml
> index acf2d5f45f4e..f277b4de5344 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx-lpi2c.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-imx-lpi2c.yaml
> @@ -17,10 +17,12 @@ properties:
>      oneOf:
>        - enum:
>            - fsl,imx7ulp-lpi2c
> +          - fsl,imx8dxl-lpi2c
>            - fsl,imx8qm-lpi2c
>            - fsl,imx8qxp-lpi2c
>        - items:
>            - enum:
> +              - fsl,imx8dxl-lpi2c

Nope. Adding in both spots is wrong.

>                - fsl,imx8qm-lpi2c
>                - fsl,imx8qxp-lpi2c
>            - const: fsl,imx7ulp-lpi2c
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
>