[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWif4n0UhaJTf7cp@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 11:23:46 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: menglong8.dong@...il.com
Cc: jiangshanlai@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mengen Sun <mengensun@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hotfix: make sysfs of unbound kworker cpumask more clever
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 11:06:41AM +0800, menglong8.dong@...il.com wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 1b3eb1e9531f..8216fc45c77b 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -5394,6 +5394,11 @@ int workqueue_set_unbound_cpumask(cpumask_var_t cpumask)
> cpumask_and(cpumask, cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
> if (!cpumask_empty(cpumask)) {
> apply_wqattrs_lock();
> + if (cpumask_equal(cpumask, wq_unbound_cpumask)) {
> + apply_wqattrs_unlock();
> + free_cpumask_var(saved_cpumask);
A few nitpicks:
* Please replace "hotfix:" with "workqueue:".
* Can you reorganize the code so that it doesn't have to alloc and free the
saved_mask?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists