[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211014102551.54983-1-guangming.cao@mediatek.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 18:25:51 +0800
From: <guangming.cao@...iatek.com>
To: <christian.koenig@....com>, <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
CC: <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <guangming.cao@...iatek.com>,
<linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<rdunlap@...radead.org>, <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>,
Guangming Cao <Guangming.Cao@...iatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] dma-buf: remove restriction of IOCTL:DMA_BUF_SET_NAME
From: Guangming Cao <Guangming.Cao@...iatek.com>
In this patch(https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/310349),
it add a new IOCTL to support dma-buf user to set debug name.
But it also added a limitation of this IOCTL, it needs the
attachments of dmabuf should be empty, otherwise it will fail.
For the original series, the idea was that allowing name change
mid-use could confuse the users about the dma-buf.
However, the rest of the series also makes sure each dma-buf have a unique
inode(https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/310387/), and any accounting
should probably use that, without relying on the name as much.
So, removing this restriction will let dma-buf userspace users to use it
more comfortably and without any side effect.
Signed-off-by: Guangming Cao <Guangming.Cao@...iatek.com>
---
drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 17 +++--------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 511fe0d217a0..5fbb3a2068a3 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -325,10 +325,8 @@ static __poll_t dma_buf_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *poll)
/**
* dma_buf_set_name - Set a name to a specific dma_buf to track the usage.
- * The name of the dma-buf buffer can only be set when the dma-buf is not
- * attached to any devices. It could theoritically support changing the
- * name of the dma-buf if the same piece of memory is used for multiple
- * purpose between different devices.
+ * It could support changing the name of the dma-buf if the same
+ * piece of memory is used for multiple purpose between different devices.
*
* @dmabuf: [in] dmabuf buffer that will be renamed.
* @buf: [in] A piece of userspace memory that contains the name of
@@ -341,25 +339,16 @@ static __poll_t dma_buf_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *poll)
static long dma_buf_set_name(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, const char __user *buf)
{
char *name = strndup_user(buf, DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN);
- long ret = 0;
if (IS_ERR(name))
return PTR_ERR(name);
- dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
- if (!list_empty(&dmabuf->attachments)) {
- ret = -EBUSY;
- kfree(name);
- goto out_unlock;
- }
spin_lock(&dmabuf->name_lock);
kfree(dmabuf->name);
dmabuf->name = name;
spin_unlock(&dmabuf->name_lock);
-out_unlock:
- dma_resv_unlock(dmabuf->resv);
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists