[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8241fb1053df3583d9f4f0698907038c8f4ac769.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:00:47 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
andrew@...n.ch, lars.povlsen@...rochip.com,
Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] reset: mchp: sparx5: Extend support for lan966x
On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 09:38 +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> This patch extends sparx5 driver to support also the lan966x. The
> process to reset the switch is the same only it has different offsets.
> Therefore make the driver more generic and add support for lan966x.
>
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> ---
> drivers/reset/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/reset/reset-microchip-sparx5.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/Kconfig b/drivers/reset/Kconfig
> index be799a5abf8a..36ce6c8bcf1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/reset/Kconfig
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ config RESET_LPC18XX
>
> config RESET_MCHP_SPARX5
> bool "Microchip Sparx5 reset driver"
> - depends on ARCH_SPARX5 || COMPILE_TEST
> + depends on ARCH_SPARX5 || SOC_LAN966 || COMPILE_TEST
> default y if SPARX5_SWITCH
> select MFD_SYSCON
> help
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-microchip-sparx5.c b/drivers/reset/reset-microchip-sparx5.c
> index f01e7db8e83b..211ee338e4b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-microchip-sparx5.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-microchip-sparx5.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> * The Sparx5 Chip Register Model can be browsed at this location:
> * https://github.com/microchip-ung/sparx-5_reginfo
> */
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -13,15 +14,22 @@
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/reset-controller.h>
>
> -#define PROTECT_REG 0x84
> -#define PROTECT_BIT BIT(10)
> -#define SOFT_RESET_REG 0x00
> -#define SOFT_RESET_BIT BIT(1)
> +struct reset_props {
> + u32 protect_reg;
> + u32 protect_bit;
> + u32 reset_reg;
> + u32 reset_bit;
> + u32 cuphy_reg;
> + u32 cuphy_bit;
> +};
>
> struct mchp_reset_context {
> struct regmap *cpu_ctrl;
> struct regmap *gcb_ctrl;
> + struct regmap *cuphy_ctrl;
> struct reset_controller_dev rcdev;
> + const struct reset_props *props;
> + struct gpio_desc *phy_reset_gpio;
> };
>
> static struct regmap_config sparx5_reset_regmap_config = {
> @@ -36,17 +44,39 @@ static int sparx5_switch_reset(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> struct mchp_reset_context *ctx =
> container_of(rcdev, struct mchp_reset_context, rcdev);
> u32 val;
> + int err;
>
> /* Make sure the core is PROTECTED from reset */
> - regmap_update_bits(ctx->cpu_ctrl, PROTECT_REG, PROTECT_BIT, PROTECT_BIT);
> + regmap_update_bits(ctx->cpu_ctrl, ctx->props->protect_reg,
> + ctx->props->protect_bit, ctx->props->protect_bit);
>
> /* Start soft reset */
> - regmap_write(ctx->gcb_ctrl, SOFT_RESET_REG, SOFT_RESET_BIT);
> + regmap_write(ctx->gcb_ctrl, ctx->props->reset_reg,
> + ctx->props->reset_bit);
>
> /* Wait for soft reset done */
> - return regmap_read_poll_timeout(ctx->gcb_ctrl, SOFT_RESET_REG, val,
> - (val & SOFT_RESET_BIT) == 0,
> + err = regmap_read_poll_timeout(ctx->gcb_ctrl, ctx->props->reset_reg, val,
> + (val & ctx->props->reset_bit) == 0,
> 1, 100);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + if (!ctx->cuphy_ctrl)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* In case there are external PHYs toggle the GPIO to release the reset
> + * of the PHYs
> + */
> + if (ctx->phy_reset_gpio) {
> + gpiod_direction_output(ctx->phy_reset_gpio, 1);
> + gpiod_set_value(ctx->phy_reset_gpio, 0);
> + gpiod_set_value(ctx->phy_reset_gpio, 1);
> + gpiod_set_value(ctx->phy_reset_gpio, 0);
> + }
> +
> + /* Release the reset of internal PHY */
> + return regmap_update_bits(ctx->cuphy_ctrl, ctx->props->cuphy_reg,
> + ctx->props->cuphy_bit, ctx->props->cuphy_bit);
> }
>
> static const struct reset_control_ops sparx5_reset_ops = {
> @@ -111,17 +141,52 @@ static int mchp_sparx5_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> + /* This resource is required on lan966x, to take the internal PHYs out
> + * of reset
Ah, here we go, required on lan966x. This should be reflected in the
binding yaml.
> + */
> + err = mchp_sparx5_map_syscon(pdev, "cuphy-syscon", &ctx->cuphy_ctrl);
> + if (err && err != -ENODEV)
> + return err;
So -ENODEV should return an error if .cuphy_reg is set?
> +
> ctx->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> ctx->rcdev.nr_resets = 1;
> ctx->rcdev.ops = &sparx5_reset_ops;
> ctx->rcdev.of_node = dn;
> + ctx->props = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + ctx->phy_reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "phy-reset",
> + GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + if (IS_ERR(ctx->phy_reset_gpio)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not get reset GPIO\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(ctx->phy_reset_gpio);
You could use dev_err_probe() here.
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists