linux-kernel - Re: [sched.h] 317419b91e: perf-sanity-tests.Parse_sched_tracepoints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALOAHbBTxLvuiuT4tT2_7C+jaXBoh0uTjzLRm+njO4tKxCtPwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:11:34 +0800
From:   Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
To:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:     acme <acme@...nel.org>, rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
        0day robot <lkp@...el.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkp <lkp@...ts.01.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Qiang Zhang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>,
        robdclark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        christian <christian@...uner.io>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        bristot <bristot@...hat.com>,
        aubrey li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
        yu c chen <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [sched.h] 317419b91e: perf-sanity-tests.Parse_sched_tracepoints_fields.fail

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:09 PM Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
>
> ----- On Oct 14, 2021, at 9:05 AM, Yafang Shao laoar.shao@...il.com wrote:
> [...]
> >> If it happens that this ABI break is noticed by more than an in-tree test
> >> program, then
> >> the kernel's ABI rules will require that this trace field size stays unchanged.
> >> This brings
> >> up once more the whole topic of "Tracepoints ABI" which has been discussed
> >> repeatedly in
> >> the past.
> >>
> >
> > I will check if any other in-tree tools depends on TASK_COMM_LEN.
>
> That's a start, but given this is a userspace ABI, out-of-tree userland
> tools which depend of this to be fixed-size are also relevant.
>

TASK_COMM_LEN isn't defined in include/uapi/ directory, so it seems
that it isn't the uerspace ABI?


-- 
Thanks
Yafang