linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc: x86: Remove `r8`, `r9` and `r10` from the clobber list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YWg/Jk4RX7gvkXAG@zn.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 14 Oct 2021 16:31:02 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>
Cc:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
        Ammar Faizi <ammar.faizi@...dents.amikom.ac.id>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc: x86: Remove `r8`, `r9` and `r10` from the
 clobber list

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:44:27PM +0000, Michael Matz wrote:
> Usually it's good to resolve a conflict towards what the document says, or 
> intended to say.  But glibc of course provides a huge amount of pressure 
> to resolve toward it ;-)

I call that "wagging the dog" or in this case "wagging the doc". :-P

> (laws are also changed toward practice when the latter overtakes :) )

Hohumm.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette