[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8553b0cd-95e4-c3db-c75a-d3b28e99f131@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 18:44:56 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: i2s-tdm: fix rockchip, cru
requirement
On 2021-10-15 15:31, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> The behaviour described in the bindings is exactly the opposite
> of what it should be, so this patch fixes the description and
> adjusts the if conditions for adding rockchip,cru to required.
>
> Fixes: 510f1c133aed ("ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: add i2s-tdm bindings")
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@...il.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml
> index ce3e18b50230..93f5221e9381 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ properties:
> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> description:
> The phandle of the cru.
> - Required if neither trcm-sync-tx-only nor trcm-sync-rx-only are specified.
> + Required if either trcm-sync-tx-only or trcm-sync-rx-only are specified.
>
> rockchip,grf:
> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> @@ -147,8 +147,13 @@ required:
> allOf:
> - if:
> properties:
> - rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: false
> - rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: false
> + rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: true
> + then:
> + required:
> + - rockchip,cru
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: true
FWIW, isn't this just a long-winded way to say
if:
anyOf:
- properties:
rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: true
- properties:
rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: true
which itself could still be more concisely
if:
not:
properties:
rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: false
rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: false
?
Robin.
> then:
> required:
> - rockchip,cru
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists