[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWnPXmB4BkEO7Yrb@google.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 18:58:38 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
marcorr@...gle.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 v5 43/45] KVM: SVM: Use a VMSA physical address
variable for populating VMCB
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
>
> In preparation to support SEV-SNP AP Creation, use a variable that holds
> the VMSA physical address rather than converting the virtual address.
> This will allow SEV-SNP AP Creation to set the new physical address that
> will be used should the vCPU reset path be taken.
The use of "variable" in the changelog and shortlog is really confusing. I read
them multiple times and still didn't fully understand the change until I sussed
out that the change is to track the PA in vcpu_svm separately from vcpu_svm.vmsa.
It's somewhat of a moot point though, because I think this can and should be
simplified.
In the SEV-ES case, svm->vmcb->control.vmsa_pa is always __pa(svm->vmsa). And
in the SNP case, svm->vmcb->control.vmsa_pa defaults to __pa(svm->vmsa), but is
not changed on INIT. Rather than do this crazy 3-way dance, simply don't write
svm->vmcb->control.vmsa_pa on INIT. Then SNP can change it at will without having
an unnecessary and confusing field.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index 1e8b26b93b4f..0bec0b71577e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -2593,13 +2593,6 @@ void sev_es_init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
svm->vmcb->control.nested_ctl |= SVM_NESTED_CTL_SEV_ES_ENABLE;
svm->vmcb->control.virt_ext |= LBR_CTL_ENABLE_MASK;
- /*
- * An SEV-ES guest requires a VMSA area that is a separate from the
- * VMCB page. Do not include the encryption mask on the VMSA physical
- * address since hardware will access it using the guest key.
- */
- svm->vmcb->control.vmsa_pa = __pa(svm->vmsa);
-
/* Can't intercept CR register access, HV can't modify CR registers */
svm_clr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR0_READ);
svm_clr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR4_READ);
@@ -2633,6 +2626,13 @@ void sev_es_init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
void sev_es_vcpu_reset(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
+ /*
+ * An SEV-ES guest requires a VMSA area that is a separate from the
+ * VMCB page. Do not include the encryption mask on the VMSA physical
+ * address since hardware will access it using the guest key.
+ */
+ svm->vmcb->control.vmsa_pa = __pa(svm->vmsa);
+
/*
* Set the GHCB MSR value as per the GHCB specification when emulating
* vCPU RESET for an SEV-ES guest.
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
This needs your SoB.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists