[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211015023413.16614-9-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:34:10 -0500
From: madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com
To: mark.rutland@....com, broonie@...nel.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
ardb@...nel.org, nobuta.keiya@...itsu.com,
sjitindarsingh@...il.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
jmorris@...ei.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com
Subject: [PATCH v9 06/11] arm64: Make profile_pc() use arch_stack_walk()
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
Currently, profile_pc() in ARM64 code walks the stack using
start_backtrace() and unwind_frame(). Make it use arch_stack_walk()
instead. This makes maintenance easier.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/time.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
index eebbc8d7123e..671b3038a772 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
@@ -32,22 +32,26 @@
#include <asm/stacktrace.h>
#include <asm/paravirt.h>
+static bool profile_pc_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc)
+{
+ unsigned long *prof_pc = arg;
+
+ if (in_lock_functions(pc))
+ return true;
+ *prof_pc = pc;
+ return false;
+}
+
unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- struct stackframe frame;
+ unsigned long prof_pc = 0;
if (!in_lock_functions(regs->pc))
return regs->pc;
- start_backtrace(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc);
-
- do {
- int ret = unwind_frame(NULL, &frame);
- if (ret < 0)
- return 0;
- } while (in_lock_functions(frame.pc));
+ arch_stack_walk(profile_pc_cb, &prof_pc, current, regs);
- return frame.pc;
+ return prof_pc;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(profile_pc);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists