lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:03:34 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>, linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>, Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>, Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: mfd: sprd: Add bindings for ums512 global registers Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2021-10-15 10:09:10) > Hi Rob, Stephen, > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 3:59 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 6:02 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote: > > > Quoting Rob Herring (2021-10-14 09:18:16) > > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:48 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I don't explicitly build DT documentation. > > > > > > > > > > Since I use the build bots to let me know if there are strange !(C, > > > > > ASM, arm, aarch64, mips, ppc, x86) build issues or ones with odd > > > > > configuration possibilities (randconfig) in the repos I maintain, you > > > > > might have to convince them that this is important too. > > > > > > > > It's really just a matter of turning on the build in > > > > allyesconfig/allmodconfig builds. I've not done that primarily because > > > > there's one person I don't want to yell at me, but I could probably > > > > make it arm and/or arm64 only. It's really arch and config > > > > independent, so doing it multiple times is kind of pointless. > > > > > > > > I assume for bots you mean kernel-ci mainly? Do you run that before > > > > stuff gets into linux-next? IMO, that's too late. But still a slight > > > > improvement if things go in via one tree. Otherwise, I see the > > > > breakage twice, 1st linux-next then the merge window. > > > > > > > > > > I run `make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES="<path to yaml file>"` but > > > nowadays this seems to check all the bindings and not just the one > > > binding I care to check. Did something break? > > > > It should apply all the schemas to the example in DT_SCHEMA_FILES. > > Originally, it only applied DT_SCHEMA_FILES schema to the example in > > DT_SCHEMA_FILES. > > Probably Stephen means that yamllint is still run on all files, which > I tried to fix in [1]? > > I've been running an improved version for months, but I haven't sent > it out yet. > Oh yeah probably. Do I need to carry this patch locally until it is fixed?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists