[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <163433739388.456562.9392744334237641054@Monstersaurus>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 23:36:33 +0100
From: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Qing Wang <wangqing@...o.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Qing Wang <wangqing@...o.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: ccs: replace snprintf in show functions with sysfs_emit
Hello,
Quoting Qing Wang (2021-10-15 07:49:22)
> show() must not use snprintf() when formatting the value to be
> returned to user space.
>
> Fix the following coccicheck warning:
> drivers/media/i2c/ccs/ccs-core.c:2717: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf.
>
> Use sysfs_emit instead of scnprintf or sprintf makes more sense.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qing Wang <wangqing@...o.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/ccs/ccs-core.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ccs/ccs-core.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ccs/ccs-core.c
> index a9403a2..21a156d 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ccs/ccs-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ccs/ccs-core.c
> @@ -2715,11 +2715,11 @@ ccs_sysfs_ident_read(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
What version of the kernel is this patch against?
I can't find the direct line mapping for this in either the linux-media
tree or torvalds master branch (closest match at
https://git.linuxtv.org/media_tree.git/tree/drivers/media/i2c/ccs/ccs-core.c#n2754)
Ah: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210603071750.11594-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com/
updated this, so I suspect this patch has been submitted against perhaps
a v5.14 kernel? It would be best to rebase and repost against the latest
branch of https://git.linuxtv.org/media_tree.git
> struct ccs_module_info *minfo = &sensor->minfo;
>
> if (minfo->mipi_manufacturer_id)
> - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%4.4x%4.4x%2.2x\n",
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%4.4x%4.4x%2.2x\n",
> minfo->mipi_manufacturer_id, minfo->model_id,
> minfo->revision_number) + 1;
This change looks good, but I think it might be better to re-indent the
minfo lines to match as well...
> else
> - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%2.2x%4.4x%2.2x\n",
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%2.2x%4.4x%2.2x\n",
> minfo->smia_manufacturer_id, minfo->model_id,
> minfo->revision_number) + 1;
here as well of course.
--
Kieran
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists