Message-ID: <0dbedba1-a6b7-89b3-2ba9-23f0c0afa60f@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 18:11:41 -0500
From:   Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/18] 4.4.289-rc1 review

Hello!

On 10/14/21 9:53 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.289 release.
> There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 16 Oct 2021 14:51:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.289-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro's test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 4.4.289-rc1
* git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc']
* git branch: linux-4.4.y
* git commit: f9c6c370e0b0668289ebd46e9b1311e1a8b6e7a1
* git describe: v4.4.288-19-gf9c6c370e0b0
* test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.4.y/build/v4.4.288-19-gf9c6c370e0b0

## No regressions (compared to v4.4.288)

## No fixes (compared to v4.4.288)

## Test result summary
total: 53612, pass: 42920, fail: 246, skip: 9117, xfail: 1329

## Build Summary
* arm: 128 total, 128 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 33 total, 33 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 17 total, 17 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 17 total, 17 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance


Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Powered by blists - more mailing lists