[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211015025847.17694-5-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:58:40 -0500
From: madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com
To: mark.rutland@....com, broonie@...nel.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
ardb@...nel.org, nobuta.keiya@...itsu.com,
sjitindarsingh@...il.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
jmorris@...ei.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com
Subject: [PATCH v10 04/11] arm64: Make return_address() use arch_stack_walk()
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
Currently, return_address() in ARM64 code walks the stack using
start_backtrace() and walk_stackframe(). Make it use arch_stack_walk()
instead. This makes maintenance easier.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c
index a6d18755652f..92a0f4d434e4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c
@@ -35,15 +35,11 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(save_return_addr);
void *return_address(unsigned int level)
{
struct return_address_data data;
- struct stackframe frame;
data.level = level + 2;
data.addr = NULL;
- start_backtrace(&frame,
- (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0),
- (unsigned long)return_address);
- walk_stackframe(current, &frame, save_return_addr, &data);
+ arch_stack_walk(save_return_addr, &data, current, NULL);
if (!data.level)
return data.addr;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists