lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWkioFQrfKAL8PvR@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 14 Oct 2021 23:41:36 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, djwong@...nel.org,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...morbit.com, hch@...radead.org,
        jane.chu@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] xfs: Implement ->notify_failure() for XFS

On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 09:09:58PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> +void fs_dax_register_holder(struct dax_device *dax_dev, void *holder,
> +		const struct dax_holder_operations *ops)
> +{
> +	dax_set_holder(dax_dev, holder, ops);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fs_dax_register_holder);
> +
> +void fs_dax_unregister_holder(struct dax_device *dax_dev)
> +{
> +	dax_set_holder(dax_dev, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fs_dax_unregister_holder);
> +
> +void *fs_dax_get_holder(struct dax_device *dax_dev)
> +{
> +	return dax_get_holder(dax_dev);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fs_dax_get_holder);

These should not be in a XFS patch.  But why do we even need this
wrappers?

> @@ -377,6 +385,8 @@ xfs_close_devices(
>  
>  		xfs_free_buftarg(mp->m_logdev_targp);
>  		xfs_blkdev_put(logdev);
> +		if (dax_logdev)
> +			fs_dax_unregister_holder(dax_logdev);
>  		fs_put_dax(dax_logdev);

I'd prefer to include the fs_dax_unregister_holder in the fs_put_dax
call to avoid callers failing to unregister it.

> @@ -411,6 +425,9 @@ xfs_open_devices(
>  	struct block_device	*logdev = NULL, *rtdev = NULL;
>  	int			error;
>  
> +	if (dax_ddev)
> +		fs_dax_register_holder(dax_ddev, mp,
> +				&xfs_dax_holder_operations);

I'd include the holder registration with fs_dax_get_by_bdev as well.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ