linux-kernel - [PATCH v6 11/48] mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Drop extra spacing when declaring stack variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:14:29 +0200
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Ryan Barnett <ryan.barnett@...lins.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 11/48] mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Drop extra spacing when declaring stack variables

Many variables will be updated (renamed, dropped, added) in the upcoming
changes, so let's simplify the style to avoid messing with spaces over
and over again.

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
index 274f2d805442..271960e7e9f0 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
@@ -113,18 +113,18 @@ static void tscadc_idle_config(struct ti_tscadc_dev *tscadc)
 
 static	int ti_tscadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	struct ti_tscadc_dev	*tscadc;
-	struct resource		*res;
-	struct clk		*clk;
-	struct device_node	*node;
-	struct mfd_cell		*cell;
-	struct property         *prop;
-	const __be32            *cur;
-	u32			val;
-	int			err, ctrl;
-	int			clock_rate;
-	int			tsc_wires = 0, adc_channels = 0, total_channels;
-	int			readouts = 0;
+	struct ti_tscadc_dev *tscadc;
+	struct resource *res;
+	struct clk *clk;
+	struct device_node *node;
+	struct mfd_cell *cell;
+	struct property *prop;
+	const __be32 *cur;
+	u32 val;
+	int err, ctrl;
+	int clock_rate;
+	int tsc_wires = 0, adc_channels = 0, total_channels;
+	int readouts = 0;
 
 	if (!pdev->dev.of_node) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not find valid DT data.\n");
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static	int ti_tscadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 static int ti_tscadc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	struct ti_tscadc_dev	*tscadc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct ti_tscadc_dev *tscadc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
 	regmap_write(tscadc->regmap, REG_SE, 0x00);
 
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused ti_tscadc_can_wakeup(struct device *dev, void *data)
 
 static int __maybe_unused tscadc_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
-	struct ti_tscadc_dev	*tscadc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct ti_tscadc_dev *tscadc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 
 	regmap_write(tscadc->regmap, REG_SE, 0x00);
 	if (device_for_each_child(dev, NULL, ti_tscadc_can_wakeup)) {
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused tscadc_suspend(struct device *dev)
 
 static int __maybe_unused tscadc_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
-	struct ti_tscadc_dev	*tscadc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct ti_tscadc_dev *tscadc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	u32 ctrl;
 
 	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
-- 
2.27.0