linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: phy: phy-stm32-usbphyc: add optional phy tuning properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5fa1f199-cb51-1ec3-9759-fd4362cdd1ea@foss.st.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:10:02 +0200
From:   Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@...s.st.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     "moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: phy: phy-stm32-usbphyc: add optional
 phy tuning properties


On 10/14/21 8:16 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 02:58:21PM +0200, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/6/21 2:38 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>> Disable child nodes while parent node is already disabled fixes the
>>>> warning. But it means to add status = "okay"; in child nodes everywhere
>>>> usbphyc is enabled.
>>> Presumably, you already have to add phy-supply everywhere.
>>>   >> Is it normal dtbs_check checks in child nodes when parent node is
>> disabled?
>>> I'll look into doing that.
>>
>> Should I wait for your potential dtbs_check update or should I disable child
>> nodes in .dtsi (and enable them along with parent node in .dts using
>> usbphyc) ?
> 
> I pushed a fix to dt-validate for this.

Thanks!

Amelie