linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: gpio: zynq: Add missing compatible strings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ab5de303-5b3d-caeb-7fa0-6dfc96576447@xilinx.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:28:00 +0200
From:   Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <monstr@...str.eu>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        "Srinivas Neeli" <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com>,
        <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Nobuhiro Iwamatsu" <iwamatsu@...auri.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <git@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: gpio: zynq: Add missing compatible strings

Hi Rob,

On 10/14/21 16:31, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 12:14:18 +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>> "xlnx,zynqmp-gpio-1.0", "xlnx,versal-gpio-1.0" and "xlnx,pmc-gpio-1.0"
>> compatible strings were not moved to yaml format. But they were in origin
>> text file.
>>
>> Fixes: 45ca16072b70 ("dt-bindings: gpio: zynq: convert bindings to YAML")
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
>> ---
>>
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-zynq.yaml | 6 +++++-
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
> 
> Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
> following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
> incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
> 
> Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
> This will change in the future.
> 
> Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1540859
> 
> 
> gpio@...a0000: '#address-cells', 'gpio-line-names', 'power-domains' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/avnet-ultra96-rev1.dt.yaml
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu100-revC.dt.yaml
> 
> gpio@...a0000: '#address-cells', 'power-domains' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zc1232-revA.dt.yaml
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zc1254-revA.dt.yaml
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zc1275-revA.dt.yaml
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zc1751-xm015-dc1.dt.yaml
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zc1751-xm016-dc2.dt.yaml
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zc1751-xm017-dc3.dt.yaml
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zc1751-xm018-dc4.dt.yaml
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zc1751-xm019-dc5.dt.yaml
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu102-rev1.0.dt.yaml
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu102-revA.dt.yaml
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu102-revB.dt.yaml
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu104-revA.dt.yaml
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu104-revC.dt.yaml
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu106-revA.dt.yaml
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu111-revA.dt.yaml
> 

I sent patches for listing power-domain and gpio-line-names based on 
this patch.

Thanks,
Michal