lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:33:18 +0000
From:   Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
Subject: [[PATCH bpf-next]] selftests/bpf: Some more atomic tests

Some new verifier tests that hit some important gaps in the parameter
space for atomic ops.

There are already exhaustive tests for the JIT part in
lib/test_bpf.c, but these exercise the verifier too.

Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c   | 38 +++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_fetch.c     | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_invalid.c   | 25 ++++++++
 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_fetch.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_invalid.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c
index 6e52dfc64415..c22dc83a41fd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c
@@ -119,3 +119,41 @@
 	},
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 },
+{
+	"Dest pointer in r0 - fail",
+	.insns = {
+		/* val = 0; */
+		BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+		/* r0 = &val */
+		BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10),
+		/* r0 = atomic_cmpxchg(&val, r0, 1); */
+		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1),
+		BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, BPF_CMPXCHG, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8),
+		/* if (r0 != 0) exit(1); */
+		BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
+		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		/* exit(0); */
+		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+},
+{
+	"Dest pointer in r0 - succeed",
+	.insns = {
+		/* r0 = &val */
+		BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10),
+		/* val = r0; */
+		BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8),
+		/* r0 = atomic_cmpxchg(&val, r0, 0); */
+		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+		BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, BPF_CMPXCHG, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8),
+		/* r1 = *r0 */
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, -8),
+		/* exit(0); */
+		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+},
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_fetch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_fetch.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3bc9ff7a860b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_fetch.c
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+#define __ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(src_reg, dst_reg, operand1, op, operand2, expect) \
+	{								\
+		"atomic fetch " #op ", src=" #dst_reg " dst=" #dst_reg,	\
+		.insns = {						\
+			/* u64 val = operan1; */			\
+			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, operand1),	\
+			/* u64 old = atomic_fetch_add(&val, operand2); */ \
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(dst_reg, BPF_REG_10),		\
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(src_reg, operand2),		\
+			BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, op,			\
+				      dst_reg, src_reg, -8),		\
+			/* if (old != operand1) exit(1); */		\
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, src_reg, operand1, 2),	\
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),			\
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),				\
+			/* if (val != result) exit (2); */		\
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -8),	\
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, expect, 2),	\
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2),			\
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),				\
+			/* exit(0); */					\
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),			\
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),				\
+		},							\
+		.result = ACCEPT,					\
+	}
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 1, BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH, 2, 3),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 1, BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH, 2, 3),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 1, BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH, 2, 3),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, 1, BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH, 2, 3),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_5, 1, BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH, 2, 3),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_8, 1, BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH, 2, 3),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0x010, BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x010),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0x010, BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x010),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0x010, BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x010),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, 0x010, BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x010),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_5, 0x010, BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x010),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_8, 0x010, BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x010),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0x010, BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x011),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0x010, BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x011),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0x010, BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x011),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, 0x010, BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x011),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_5, 0x010, BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x011),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_8, 0x010, BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x011),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0x010, BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x001),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0x010, BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x001),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0x010, BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x001),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, 0x010, BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x001),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_5, 0x010, BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x001),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_8, 0x010, BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH, 0x011, 0x001),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0x010, BPF_XCHG, 0x011, 0x011),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0x010, BPF_XCHG, 0x011, 0x011),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0x010, BPF_XCHG, 0x011, 0x011),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, 0x010, BPF_XCHG, 0x011, 0x011),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_5, 0x010, BPF_XCHG, 0x011, 0x011),
+__ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_8, 0x010, BPF_XCHG, 0x011, 0x011),
+#undef __ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_invalid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_invalid.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..39272720b2f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_invalid.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+#define __INVALID_ATOMIC_ACCESS_TEST(op)					\
+	{								\
+		"atomic " #op " access through non-pointer ",			\
+		.insns = {						\
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),			\
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),			\
+			BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, op, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, -8), \
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),			\
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),				\
+		},							\
+		.result = REJECT,					\
+		.errstr = "R1 invalid mem access 'inv'"			\
+	}
+__INVALID_ATOMIC_ACCESS_TEST(BPF_ADD),
+__INVALID_ATOMIC_ACCESS_TEST(BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH),
+__INVALID_ATOMIC_ACCESS_TEST(BPF_ADD),
+__INVALID_ATOMIC_ACCESS_TEST(BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH),
+__INVALID_ATOMIC_ACCESS_TEST(BPF_AND),
+__INVALID_ATOMIC_ACCESS_TEST(BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH),
+__INVALID_ATOMIC_ACCESS_TEST(BPF_OR),
+__INVALID_ATOMIC_ACCESS_TEST(BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH),
+__INVALID_ATOMIC_ACCESS_TEST(BPF_XOR),
+__INVALID_ATOMIC_ACCESS_TEST(BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH),
+__INVALID_ATOMIC_ACCESS_TEST(BPF_XCHG),
+__INVALID_ATOMIC_ACCESS_TEST(BPF_CMPXCHG),
-- 
2.33.0.1079.g6e70778dc9-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists