[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <Z0HPX3gxjjYhZnksAQfP6g-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 16:58:19 +0700
From: Ammar Faizi <ammar.faizi@...dents.amikom.ac.id>
To: Bedirhan KURT <windowz414@...weeb.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Ammar Faizi <ammar.faizi@...dents.amikom.ac.id>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Peter Cordes <peter@...des.ca>,
Louvian Lyndal <louvianlyndal@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tools/nolibc: x86-64: Fix startup code bug
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:26 PM Bedirhan KURT <windowz414@...weeb.org> wrote:
>
> (Sending again as previous email had my Ubuntu username as sender and
> Thunderbird attached my GPG key on it. Hope I cancelled on time.)
>
> Hi Ammar,
>
> I've tested your patchset on my local clone of Linux kernel with up to
> date fetch of master branch and this is the output I've gotten after
> executing the test binary compiled;
>
[...]
>
> I hope these are helpful and I could help throughout this patchset. I
> didn't get any SegFaults compared to my tests with same code on pure
> state either so I think everything works just fine. You can append me in
> Tested-by tag if you want.
>
Thanks for testing!
Tested-by: Bedirhan KURT <windowz414@...weeb.org>
--
Ammar Faizi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists