linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] locking/rwsem: disable preemption for spinning region

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YWlV7gVnPColm61C@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 12:20:30 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@...driver.com>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, longman@...hat.com,
        boqun.feng@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] locking/rwsem: disable preemption for spinning
 region

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:13:59PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 09:41:53PM +0800, Yanfei Xu wrote:
> > The spinning region rwsem_spin_on_owner() should not be preempted,
> > however the rwsem_down_write_slowpath() invokes it and don't disable
> > preemption. Fix it by adding a pair of preempt_disable/enable().
> 
> I'm thinking we should do this patch before #1, otherwise we have a
> single patch window where we'll trigger the assertion, no?

Anyway, I've stuck the lot (reordered) into my locking/core branch, lets
see what the robots make of it ;-)