lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 12:23:30 +0100
From:   Mark Pashmfouroush <markpash@...udflare.com>
To:     markpash@...udflare.com
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
        Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>,
        Joe Stringer <joe@...ium.io>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>,
        Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>,
        Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add tests for accessing ifindex in bpf_sk_lookup

A new field was added to the bpf_sk_lookup data that users can access.
Add tests that validate that the new ifindex field contains the right
data.

Signed-off-by: Mark Pashmfouroush <markpash@...udflare.com>

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
index aee41547e7f4..951e5dcf297e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
@@ -937,6 +937,37 @@ static void test_drop_on_lookup(struct test_sk_lookup *skel)
 			.connect_to	= { EXT_IP6, EXT_PORT },
 			.listen_at	= { EXT_IP6, INT_PORT },
 		},
+		/* The program will drop on success, meaning that the ifindex
+		 * was 1.
+		 */
+		{
+			.desc		= "TCP IPv4 drop on valid ifindex",
+			.lookup_prog	= skel->progs.check_ifindex,
+			.sotype		= SOCK_STREAM,
+			.connect_to	= { EXT_IP4, EXT_PORT },
+			.listen_at	= { EXT_IP4, EXT_PORT },
+		},
+		{
+			.desc		= "TCP IPv6 drop on valid ifindex",
+			.lookup_prog	= skel->progs.check_ifindex,
+			.sotype		= SOCK_STREAM,
+			.connect_to	= { EXT_IP6, EXT_PORT },
+			.listen_at	= { EXT_IP6, EXT_PORT },
+		},
+		{
+			.desc		= "UDP IPv4 drop on valid ifindex",
+			.lookup_prog	= skel->progs.check_ifindex,
+			.sotype		= SOCK_DGRAM,
+			.connect_to	= { EXT_IP4, EXT_PORT },
+			.listen_at	= { EXT_IP4, EXT_PORT },
+		},
+		{
+			.desc		= "UDP IPv6 drop on valid ifindex",
+			.lookup_prog	= skel->progs.check_ifindex,
+			.sotype		= SOCK_DGRAM,
+			.connect_to	= { EXT_IP6, EXT_PORT },
+			.listen_at	= { EXT_IP6, EXT_PORT },
+		},
 	};
 	const struct test *t;
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup.c
index 19d2465d9442..0f3283bfe3b6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup.c
@@ -84,6 +84,14 @@ int lookup_drop(struct bpf_sk_lookup *ctx)
 	return SK_DROP;
 }
 
+SEC("sk_lookup")
+int check_ifindex(struct bpf_sk_lookup *ctx)
+{
+	if (ctx->ifindex == 1)
+		return SK_DROP;
+	return SK_PASS;
+}
+
 SEC("sk_reuseport")
 int reuseport_pass(struct sk_reuseport_md *ctx)
 {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c
index d78627be060f..0b3088da1e89 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c
@@ -229,6 +229,24 @@
 		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
 			    offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, local_port)),
 
+		/* 1-byte read from ifindex field */
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+			    offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, ifindex)),
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+			    offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, ifindex) + 1),
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+			    offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, ifindex) + 2),
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+			    offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, ifindex) + 3),
+		/* 2-byte read from ifindex field */
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+			    offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, ifindex)),
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+			    offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, ifindex) + 2),
+		/* 4-byte read from ifindex field */
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+			    offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, ifindex)),
+
 		/* 8-byte read from sk field */
 		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
 			    offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, sk)),
@@ -351,6 +369,20 @@
 	.expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
 	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
+{
+	"invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup ifindex field",
+	.insns = {
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+			    offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, ifindex)),
+		BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+	.result = REJECT,
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
+	.expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
+},
 /* invalid 1,2,4-byte reads from 8-byte fields in bpf_sk_lookup */
 {
 	"invalid 4-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup sk field",
-- 
2.31.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists